# Logical Deduction - Aptitude Questions and Answers - RejinpaulPlacement

@ : Home > Logical Reasoning > Logical Deduction > Section - 2

 Directions to Solve In each of the questions below are given statements followed by four conclusions numbered I, II, III and IV, You have to take the given statements to be true even if they seem to be at variance from the commonly known facts. Read all the conclusions and then decide which of the given conclusions logically follows from the given statements disregarding commonly known facts.
31.
Statements: All buildings are windows. No toys is building. Some tigers are toys.

Conclusions:
I.Some tigers are buildings.
II.Some windows are tigers.
III.All toys are tigers.
IV.Some windows are toys.

Solution: No toy is building. All buildings are windows. Since the middle term 'buildings' is distributed twice and one premise is negative, the conclusion must be particular negative and should not contain the middle term. So, it follows that 'Some windows are not toys'. Some tigers are toys. No toy is building. Since one premise is particular and the other premise is negative, the conclusion must be particular negative and should not contain the middle term. So, it follows that 'Some tigers are not buildings'.
32.
Statements: Some papers are cats. All cats are bats. No bat is horse.

Conclusions:
I.Some papers are horses.
II.No horse is cat.
III.Some bats are papers.
IV.All papers are bats.
Answer: (B) Only II and III follow

Solution: Some papers are cats. All cats are bats. Since one premise is particular, the conclusion must be particular and should not contain the middle term. So, it follows that 'Some papers are bats'. III is the converse of this conclusion and so it holds. All cats are bats. No bat is horse. Since both the premises are universal and one premise is negative, the conclusion must be universal negative and should not contain the middle term. So, it follows that 'No cat is horse'. II is the converse of this conclusion and so it holds. Some papers are bats. No bat is horse. Since one premise is particular and the other negative, the conclusion must be particular negative and should not contain the middle term. So, it follows that 'Some papers are not horses'.
33.
Statements:Some tapes are discs. Some discs are cassettes. Some cassettes are songs.

Conclusions:
I. Some songs are discs.
II.Some cassettes are tapes.
III.Some songs are tapes.
IV.No song is a disc.
Answer: (A) Only either I or IV follows

Solution: Since each combination of premises shall contain two particular premises, no definite conclusion can be drawn. However, I and IV involve the extreme terms of the second and third premises and form a complementary pair. Thus, either I or IV follows.
34.
Statements: No table is fruit. No fruit is window. All windows are chairs.

Conclusions:
I. No window is table.
II.No chair is fruit.
III.No chair is table.
IV.All chairs are windows.

Solution: No table is fruit. No fruit is window. Since both the premises are negative, no definite conclusion follows. No fruit is window. All windows are chairs. Since the middle term 'windows' is distributed twice and one premise is negative, the conclusion must be particular negative. So, it follows that 'Some chairs are not fruits'.
35.
Statements: All jungles are buses. All books are buses. All fruits are books.

Conclusions:
I. Some fruits are jungles.
II.Some buses are books.
III.Some buses are jungles.
IV. All fruits are buses.