# Logical Deduction - Aptitude Questions and Answers - RejinpaulPlacement

@ : Home > Logical Reasoning > Logical Deduction > Section - 1

 Directions to Solve In each question below are given two statements followed by two conclusions numbered I and II. You have to take the given two statements to be true even if they seem to be at variance from commonly known facts. Read the conclusion and then decide which of the given conclusions logically follows from the two given statements, disregarding commonly known facts. Give answer: (A) If only conclusion I follows (B) If only conclusion II follows (C) If either I or II follows (D) If neither I nor II follows and (E) If both I and II follow.
11.
Statements:All fish are tortoise. No tortoise is a crocodile.

Conclusions:
I. No crocodile is a fish.
II.No fish is a crocodile.
Answer: (E) Both I and II follow

Solution: Since both the premises are universal and one premise is negative, the conclusion must be universal negative. Also, the conclusion should not contain the middle term. So, II follows; I is the converse of II and thus it also holds.
12.
Statements: Some dedicated souls are angels. All social workers are angels.

Conclusions:
I. Some dedicated souls are social workers.
II.Some social workers are dedicated souls.
Answer: (D) Neither I nor II follows

Solution: The first premise is an I type proposition. So, the middle term 'angels' forming the predicate is not distributed. The second premise is an A type proposition. So, the middle term 'angels' forming the predicate is not distributed. Since the middle term is not distributed even once in the premises, no definite conclusion follows.
13.
Statements:No gentleman is poor. All gentlemen are rich.

Conclusions:
I. No poor man is rich.
II.No rich man is poor.
Answer: (D) Neither I nor II follows

Solution: The first premise is an E-type proposition, So, the middle term 'gentleman' forming the subject is distributed. The second premise is an A-type proposition. So, the middle term 'gentlemen' forming the subject is distributed. Since the middle term is distributed twice, the conclusion cannot be universal. Since one premise is negative, the conclusion must be negative. Thus, it follows that 'Some rich men are not poor'. Thus, neither I nor II follows.
14.
Statements:Some swords are sharp. All swords are rusty

Conclusions:
I. Some rusty things are sharp.
II.Some rusty things are not sharp.